Maria Map Maker raster import benchmark: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The following benchmarks was perfomed to indicate the decrease in processing time for raster import in Maria Map Maker. We have used three different raster datasets on three different versions of M3. == System == * Windows Server 2019 * Intel Core i9-10900 (10 cores, 20 logical processors) * 128 GB RAM * 2 TB NVMe disk == Input datasets == {| class="wikitable" |+ !Name !Format !No. files !File size !Pixel size |- |N2000 |GeoTIFF |1 |48 MB |80 m |- |ECW Innlandet |EC...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:20, 18 October 2022
The following benchmarks was perfomed to indicate the decrease in processing time for raster import in Maria Map Maker. We have used three different raster datasets on three different versions of M3.
System
- Windows Server 2019
- Intel Core i9-10900 (10 cores, 20 logical processors)
- 128 GB RAM
- 2 TB NVMe disk
Input datasets
| Name | Format | No. files | File size | Pixel size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N2000 | GeoTIFF | 1 | 48 MB | 80 m |
| ECW Innlandet | ECW | 1 | 1440 MB | 0.25 m |
| N50 | GeoTIFF | 1335 | 16.6 GB | 2.5 m |
Results
