Comparing compression in different formats

This is a comparison of a small selection of compression methods used in georeferenced raster imagery. The intention is to find which method gives the best "bang for buck" - the best quality for the smallest file size. The measure for quality is [SSIM] (Structural similarity), which is a perception-based model to calculate the difference between two images.

We compare a lossless master image to a compressed image and measure the SSIM using the Python package called "". This is repeated with a range of quality values for the compressed images. This should give an indication of which method is most efficient. In addition, it will indicate the quality value which will achieve the same SSIM across the compression methods.

Note that each of the file formats use a different scale for the input "quality" parameter. We include a wide range of the legal values from each of the formats, so this difference should not matter.