Maria Map Maker raster import benchmark: Difference between revisions

From Maria GDK Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The following benchmarks was perfomed to indicate the decrease in processing time for raster import in Maria Map Maker. We have used three different raster datasets on three different versions of M3. == System == * Windows Server 2019 * Intel Core i9-10900 (10 cores, 20 logical processors) * 128 GB RAM * 2 TB NVMe disk == Input datasets == {| class="wikitable" |+ !Name !Format !No. files !File size !Pixel size |- |N2000 |GeoTIFF |1 |48 MB |80 m |- |ECW Innlandet |EC...")
 
Line 37: Line 37:


== Results ==
== Results ==
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark N2000.png|left|550x550px]]
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark N2000.png|550x550px]]
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark ECWInnlandet.png|center|550x550px]]
 
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark N50.png|right|550x550px]]
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark ECWInnlandet.png|550x550px]]
 
[[File:M3 rasterimport benchmark N50.png|550x550px]]

Revision as of 14:21, 18 October 2022

The following benchmarks was perfomed to indicate the decrease in processing time for raster import in Maria Map Maker. We have used three different raster datasets on three different versions of M3.

System

  • Windows Server 2019
  • Intel Core i9-10900 (10 cores, 20 logical processors)
  • 128 GB RAM
  • 2 TB NVMe disk

Input datasets

Name Format No. files File size Pixel size
N2000 GeoTIFF 1 48 MB 80 m
ECW Innlandet ECW 1 1440 MB 0.25 m
N50 GeoTIFF 1335 16.6 GB 2.5 m

Results

M3 rasterimport benchmark N2000.png

M3 rasterimport benchmark ECWInnlandet.png

M3 rasterimport benchmark N50.png